3/14/2024 0 Comments Tik tok video bokeh museumIf you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.īut you know what? We change lives. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.” My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. “Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. He also noted he was optimistic about passing broader data privacy legislation that would cover all social media platforms.Ībout a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”: While he would arguably have the most to lose of any member of Congress if the platform were banned, he still acknowledged a six-year-old Chinese law that, in his words, basically says “that if Chinese intelligence services tell TikTok to hand over all of your data, they have to do it, and they don’t have to tell you.” Jackson called senators’ grilling of CEO Shou Zi Chew “brutal” and explained the basis for their concerns about privacy and national security. Notably, for Congress’s biggest star on TikTok, he was relatively restrained in his write-up of a contentious, marathon hearing with TikTok’s CEO this spring.Īmid a bipartisan push to ban TikTok, Mr. In the next few weeks he’s holding a workshop for digital staffers, who can help other members with such work. Other members are eager to develop his kind of following, but when they ask how long it takes him, they may be put off by his answer: many, many hours. It’s just a super-deep rabbit hole.”Ĭan the Constitution be self-executing? If not, who decides? “I was watching a bunch the other night about color-grading. “I watched a bunch of YouTube videos,” he explains. He does all the editing on Adobe Premiere, which he taught himself. He’s even learned that there’s a special word for making the bowl of bananas in the background just the right amount of blurry: bokeh. Now, nearly a decade later, he writes several Substack posts a month and films his own highly produced videos – with a script, a high-quality Sony camera (iPhones just don’t cut it, he tells fellow lawmakers), a microphone, and lighting that he tests out on his kids so they can be part of the process. The public response was so positive that he started considering it part of the job: keeping people posted. “I was this young, broke politician, and social media was the only way I had to communicate with my constituents.” “People had no idea who I was,” he recalls. He had started with Facebook and Twitter when he was a 31-year-old who suddenly became a state senator when he was appointed to fill a vacancy. two-thirds.īalance Is enough still enough? Sweden reckons with its culture of ‘lagom.’ Coming in, he guesstimated the proportion of lawmakers on “Team Outrage” vs. And that list, he says, presented a warped view. He once did, too. Before he ran for Congress, he tried writing down all the members whose names he knew. He understands why outrage politics can seem like the only game in town, he explains. On an afternoon when votes were canceled because of intra-GOP wrangling, he sits down on his office couch for an interview. “I can prove to them that that is false,” he adds, noting that his own nonsensational, explanatory approach has garnered him 2.2 million followers on TikTok – and, he says, 1 million on Substack. “I think a lot of folks in politics and some folks in media treat the outrage model as basically the only way to get attention,” he says. Representative Jackson says the place reminds him of high school, and also a wax museum come to life. representative is carving out an alternative niche to outrage politics with his videos of Congress behind the scenes.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |